Wouldn't it be
wonderful if you could be convinced not to worry about death, pain, and other
mental anguishes with no tricks or drugs? Well, there is some old school
medicine that does work. Somehow, antique stuff tends to pushed back by newer,
shinier offers, but the Tusculan Disputations, among others, deserve to be
brought back to the foreground. Written by Cicero in dialogue form after
retiring from public office and taking philosophy full time, it delivers on this promise.
It consists of five journées (can't find an English equivalent:
'days' doesn't quite capture it) of Cicero and interlocutor covering different
evils, one at a time. These are: on Death, on Pain, On Affliction, on Other
Tribulations (Fear, Joy, Desire) and On How Happiness can be Attained by
Oneself. Though presented sequentially, each one can be read by itself and each
is prologued with an address to Brutus (yes, that
Brutus) to which the work as a whole is dedicated. Chronologically, the
Disputations can be placed second in a series of related treatises that also
include On the Ends of Good and Bad Things (De
Finibus) and On the Nature of the Gods. These treatises, and more, were written in a down period of Cicero's life where he no longer held an important sway on Rome's politics and was grieving over the loss of his daughter.
There are only two
participants: Cicero and his interlocutor.The opponent or interlocutor hardly
puts up a fight and is always overwhelmed by Cicero's reasonings. These cover
all the bases and if something somehow is left out, it is usually pretty minor. Unlike in some Plato's
Dialogues, the interlocutor has the courtesy to allow the defendant, in this
case Cicero, lengthier, uninterrupted expositions.
Some working
knowledge of mythology, a prior read of the Iliad, a passing familiarity with
Plato's Dialogues (Apology, Fedo) and a
feel for Roman history I'd say are required to not get lost in the references.
Other than that it is an easy straightforward read.
Technically,
Cicero's philosophy belongs to that of the New Academy (I think) and tries to
stay away as much as possible from the Epicureans and avoid the argumentative
excesses of the Stoics. However, I feel that he leans more to the latter.
Far from being a
disjointed collection of maxims and viewpoints, Cicero's work is meticulously
crafted and seamlessly systematic which
makes it a joy to read. In the end, Cicero's arguments are very convincing,
even if you assume a show-me attitude. He completely won me over on each and
every of the five days and has changed me for the better. By itself it can work
as a self contained secular life philosophy (though I still feel that the Bible
and divine revelation is what really allows it to turn full circle).
The Tusculan was the
best book I read in 2013. Now that I'm on a roll here I'll mention my
"Hall Of Fame" stoic writings:
- The Tusculan
- Epictetus' Discourses
- On Anger by Seneca
- Epictetus' Handbook
- Seneca's Letters to Lucilius
- Seneca's other Moral Dialogues
- Meditations of Marcus Aurelius.
- Fragments of the Ancient Stoics
- Musonius Rufus' Sayings
- On Duties by Cicero
The first three by themselves make an unbeatable trio.
Honorable mentions:
- Life is a Dream by Calderón de la Barca. Worth a read in any case
- Boethius' Consolation of Philosophy
And one more thing: if you are interested in the life itself of Cicero, there's a great bio from Anthony Trollope on Librivox. Although the ongoing theme with it is that Cicero is wrongly accused by other authors of being a coward or unsteady in his views and political affiliations, it is a fine read for all the detail and context that Trollope provides. I'm re-listening to it right now. If you're in a hurry, Plutarch's life on him might suit you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment